I firmly believe in small, incremental steps of privacy protection, that is, protect your privacy where you can and where you think it necessary. I am not the type of person that throws the hands up in the air and totally gives up because I don’t have anonymity from state-level entities. We do know that various contemporary countermeasures are effective against passive tracking efforts by non-state level adversaries. tracking by advertisers harder, then no, privacy is probably not a “fantasy” or a “lie” then. If your expectation is to make general mass surveillance via e.g.
If you expect to be anonymous from a government specifically targeting you, then yes, perhaps privacy is a lie then for you (although not impossible, I would think, just extremely hard to achieve). What is a “lie” and a “fantasy” depends on your expectations, I would say. > LOL another marketing scheme in the name of ‘privacy’ the fantasy and lie of the internet? It is not a real thing, that’s all I hoped people would get by Signature I still can’t believe they chose that name though, just awkward.īut seriously, people should stop using words like security and privacy in the same sentence as browser and internet.
Emergency 20 patch download#
If they aren’t going to do what the promised, what will make you think ‘Hexavalent-Browser’ with so many stupid things already done by them without even having 1 download release in place because of being ‘at very development stage’ will change anything? At least for now, doing a quick search, it seems the developers are not political in their twitter accounts or anything so there is a little hope about they are not going to be annoying but thinking they will fix the internet and fix privacy is kind of an oxymoron. I mean, you always talk about Brave and how amazing it is, and they couldn’t even do a simple thing, don’t censor like you promise you wouldn’t do… They literally censored RT from their news sources and they said Goggles will probably make censorship worst in some countries and if they get a order from governments to do anything they will do it because it is better to avoid getting in trouble than getting removed from Apple or Google store or anything like that.
Emergency 20 patch software#
Maybe it is their little hidden message to already tell us they will be cancer just like most browser companies are? or somehow they are in the humanitarian plan of making us aware of something everyone should know about?Īnyway, all I know is it will suck, and they will not protect any privacy like no browser does and like no browser can’t, you can literally block every IP of Google or Microsoft (and then, the own respective connections like Vivaldi, Brave, Yandex Opera own IPs) from any browser with a Firewall… 10 Firewalls, hardware and software and adblockers, and even if you ‘don’t send information’ to any of them… what do you think will happen? You will send information to someone, to every website you visit, your ISP, the fraud VPN company will know everything about you, the DNS resolver too, the websites analytics… so, do you think the Gov Agencies will stop because you are using a nobody’s browser with such an ‘interesting’ name? Do you think you will not get spied on only because (backdoored) encryptions and false ‘privacy’ or ‘security’ marketing schemes? So… well, sounds like an amazing name to have in your browser, no? I mean, you don’t need to do much, only need to find the name in one of those lame ‘health’ websites from governments that barely tell you anything important, in the case of Hexavalent they do, because it is a known real thing.īut they will all agree about: ‘known to cause cancer’ and bad for respiratory system, kidneys, liver, eyes and skin, etc. It’s actually like a bad April fools’ joke at this point… are you sure is even real or the developers are just braindead? LOL another marketing scheme in the name of ‘privacy’ the fantasy and lie of the internet? let me guess, they will get search deals or add crypto or some pyramid like scheme to get money in the name of the hoax called internet privacy?
0 kommentar(er)
